Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
multiplesections [2020/08/02 20:32] – New solutions 4 and 7 tarquinwj | multiplesections [2020/08/02 23:49] (current) – Borders done with tex-map tarquinwj | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 269: | Line 269: | ||
For cross sections of pitches and ledge routes with their own survey data, you can create multiple scraps at the different heights, so that they can have different colours at the different heights. | For cross sections of pitches and ledge routes with their own survey data, you can create multiple scraps at the different heights, so that they can have different colours at the different heights. | ||
- | You may want to draw a border around the entire set of cross sections, to show that they are related spatially to each other. A regular " | + | You may want to draw a border around the entire set of cross sections, to show that they are related spatially to each other. A regular " |
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | code tex-map | ||
+ | \framethickness=0.5mm | ||
+ | </ | ||
Normally, you would want to " | Normally, you would want to " | ||
Line 320: | Line 325: | ||
For each station that already has an existing cross section drawing, create a scrap, and follow method 4's approach for adding the cross section to the scrap, and positioning it correctly. | For each station that already has an existing cross section drawing, create a scrap, and follow method 4's approach for adding the cross section to the scrap, and positioning it correctly. | ||
- | You may want to draw a border around the entire set of cross sections, to show that they are related spatially to each other. A regular " | + | You may want to draw a border around the entire set of cross sections, to show that they are related spatially to each other. A regular " |
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | code tex-map | ||
+ | \framethickness=0.5mm | ||
+ | </ | ||
" | " |